Posts tagged as:

marine security

button

GAO report highly critical of TWIC program.

by Douglas Gould on May 26, 2011

Well, we all bitched and moaned when the TWIC program came around. We whined and stamped our feet, but in the end, we all complied and paid our fees and made multiple trips to the TWIC centers. We asked “why” and never got a very satisfactory answer, so we manned up and went with the program.

There were many licensed mariners who just couldn’t believe that they were going to be required to get some kind of secure area pass/ID just to keep running a 6PAC fishing boat, or the Block Island launch for instance. Even more confused where the poor bastards with a license and no job; why would they need access to secure port areas when all they did was a few yacht deliveries every year?

“Because everyone has to have one” was the answer. The TWIC was forever connected to your Master’s License. No TWICie, no laundry.

Last week, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report of their investigation into the overall effectiveness of the TWIC program. Here is the very first sentence of the report;

Internal control weaknesses governing the enrollment, background checking, and use of TWIC potentially limit the program’s ability to provide reasonable assurance that access to secure areas of Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA)-regulated facilities is restricted to qualified individuals.

further down, in the second paragraph-

Further, DHS has not demonstrated that TWIC, as currently implemented and planned, is more effective than prior approaches used to limit access to ports and facilities, such as using facility specific identity credentials with business cases.

D’OH!

Allow me to translate the government speak into plain old sailor talk; “The TWIC program was never properly designed to do anything other than piss off a bunch of licensed mariners. The assholes who set up TWIC were underway, not under command – and rushed the whole fucking program. Furthermore, as far as we can tell, the entire thing has done nothing but flood the bilges of DHS subcontractors with taxpayer money and hasn’t made our ports any safer than the way we used to do it.”

You can read the entire report if you have an hour and some good wine. If you don’t have that kind of ambition, just read the page of highlights, which begins “What GAO Found” on the second page.

Here are just a few of the choice words from the body of the report, with my comments in blue:

…our investigators conducted covert tests to assess the use of TWIC as a means for controlling access to secure areas of MTSA-regulated facilities. During covert tests of TWIC at several selected ports, our investigators were successful in accessing ports using counterfeit TWICs, authentic TWICs acquired through fraudulent means, and false business cases(i.e.,reasons for requesting access). It was easy to sneak in.

…the TWIC program’s internal controls for positively identifying an applicant, arriving at a security threat determination for that individual, and approving the issuance of a TWIC, are not designed to provide reasonable assurance that only qualified applicants can acquire TWICs.  This is actually huge. This doesn’t say that mistakes were made by employees of the TWIC program. This says that the program itself is not designed to assure only qualified individuals can get a TWIC. I find this the most damming sentence in the entire report.

As confirmed by TWIC program officials, there are ways for an unqualified individual to acquire an authentic TWIC. According to TWIC program officials, to meet the stated program purpose, TSA’s focus in designing the TWIC program was on facilitating the issuance of TWICs to maritime workers. Don’t worry about the background checks; just get the cards issued!

…TWIC program officials told us that control weaknesses were not addressed prior to initiating the TWIC program because they had not previously identified them, or because they would be too costly to address. “How the hell were we supposed know how to accomplish what the program is designed to accomplish? You know how much that would cost??”

…according to TSA officials, a primary reason for not requiring employer information be captured by applicant processes is that many applicants do not have employers, lots of self-employed captains out there and that many employers will not accept employment applications from workers who do not already have a TWIC… footnote on same page: TWIC is unlike other federally-sponsored access control credentials, such as the Department of Defense’s Common Access Card—the agencywide standard identification card—for which sponsorship by an employer is required. For these federal credentialing programs, employer sponsorship begins with the premise that an individual is known to need certain access as part of their employment. Further, the employing agency is to conduct a background investigation on the individual and has access to other personal information, such as prior employers, places of residency, and education, which they may confirm as part of the employment process and use to establish the individual’s identity.

I could go on and on, but it’s too depressing. Read as much as you can stand below.

Final note. The GAO blasts the DHS and TSA in the report, leaving the USCG treading water on this, and correctly so; the USCG didn’t screw this up, TSA did.

Update: U.S. Rep. John L. Mica (R-FL), the Chairman of the U.S. House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, testified at a Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing today during which the GAO report was released. Chairman Mica, one of the requestors of today’s GAO report, said,

“TWIC is turning into a dangerous and expensive experiment in security.”“Nearly half-a-billion dollars has been spent since TSA was directed to issue biometric security cards to transportation workers,” said Mica, who was chairman of the House Aviation Subcommittee in 2001 when the 9/11 terrorists attacks occurred, and is one of the authors of the legislation that created the TSA. “Yet today, ten years later and with no approved biometric reader, TWICs are at best no more useful than library cards,”

Except, library cards are free….

Share
button

Dive Boat Delivered to Boston Fire Dept.

by Douglas Gould on October 25, 2010

ribcraft diveboat

From Marinelink.com: Ribcraft Delivered to Boston Fire Dept..

Designed and built specifically for the Boston Fire Department, the 30-ft professional grade Ribcraft 9.0 is capable of supporting ten divers plus crew….equipped with twin 225HP Evinrude E-TEC outboard engines capable of reaching speeds in excess of 50 mph.

The Boston Fire Department has a dive team? A 10 man dive team? How the hell do you put out a fire underwater? Ok, they need it to rescue drowning victims and surfers and … what? You know Doug, like emergency underwater rescue stuff, searching for bodies and cars that drive off a bridge.

I guess the well established Massachusetts State Police Dive Team, with an office right there in Boston, just wasn’t up to the task? From their website:

[team] members are available 24 hours a day and are ready for deployment to any part of the state at a moments notice. Because of the highly aquatic geography of Massachusetts, divers frequently perform missions in lakes, rivers, ponds, quarries, as well as the immediate coastline of Massachusetts....The Team performs missions for such agencies as the MDC, MWRA, FBI, Secret Service, U.S. Customs, U.S. Coast Guard, and U.S. Navy as well as local law enforcement and fire departments

Yeah, but, sometimes the State Police Divers are busy with, like, you know…. state diver business, and they can’t respond quickly enough, and the Boston FD can respond in excess of 50 mph! Unless of course the Boston Police Department beats them to the scene. Yeah, the Boston PD has a dive team too: Boston Police Rescue/Recovery Dive Team, primarily for underwater crime investigation;

The Team responds to all underwater incidents, which occur in the City of Boston, or along the 42 sq. miles of Boston Harbor. We are the primary investigators of any crime, which occur on the Harbor Islands.

We engage in evidence recovery and preservation in criminal cases..

the team can be deployed using any one of the vessels attached to the Harbor Patrol Unit. They are the 86′ St. Michael, an old Navy Minesweeper, the 41′ Due Process or the 27′ Boston Whaler

Between the State Police and the Boston PD, the good taxpayers of Boston certainly aren’t lacking for underwater law enforcement or crime scene recovery, nor does anyone need to go in excess of 50 mph to recover a dead body, which leaves the fire department’s Marine Unit Three with one mission: on the water rescue. But, what are these firemen-dressed-as-divers going to do when they get on scene with a heart attack victim? Or a boat actually on fire? (Did you notice that this fire department boat has NO fixed firefighting pumps?!?)

Contrast this to the story of the fire department that watched a guy’s house burn down, and you see how completely disjointed and fragmented the country’s public policy is about taxpayer dollars and rescue assets. The report of an empty kayak floating in Boston Harbor could mobilize 4-5 rescue agencies and a few million dollars of taxpayer assets to search the bay. A house actually on fire in Tennessee burns to the ground while firefighters from another tax district watch.

Your tax dollars, hard at work.

Share

Area Maritime Security Committees

Found this item in today’s Federal Register: This notice requests individuals interested in serving on an Area Maritime Security Committee in any Captain of the Port Zone, nationwide, to submit their applications for membership to their local Captain of the Port. These committees advise the Secretary of DHS, through the Coast Guard, on matters relating [...]

Share
December 24, 2008 Read the full article →

DHS Small Vessel Security Strategy – Good News/Bad News?

Well, we have suspected this was coming along now for some time. We worried, we speculated, we conjectured…we wondered. Finally, the Department of Homeland Security has issued a one hundred percent positively, absolutely sure, here is what the DHS might kinda sorta think about doing but we’re not really sure but here is our best [...]

Share
May 1, 2008 Read the full article →